Framework · MindXO · CC BY 4.0 · free
Deployer AI Risk Register
82 deployer-side risks plus 61 MITRE ATLAS-anchored entries, crosswalked to ISO/IEC 42001, the EU AI Act and both OWASP Top 10s.
A single organisation's project.
Source: airiskdeployer.org↗
Against the five tests
The map is scored for a specific reader: a firm of roughly 20 to 500 people, no CISO and no compliance department, using agents it bought and agents it built, looking for a named document it can check itself against.
| Test | The question | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Agent-scoped | Covers agents, tools, MCP and autonomy, not AI in general. | ◐ |
| Adopter-facing | Usable by a firm deploying agents, not only building them. | ✔ |
| Checklist-shaped | Enumerable requirements you can pass or fail. | ✘ |
| Right-sized | Digestible without dedicated security staff. | ✔ |
| Recognised | A name a client, auditor or insurer would accept. | ✘ |
✔ yes · ◐ partly · ✘ no · scores are this site’s reading of the document
The sixth test: risk across many agents
The five tests above ask whether a firm can use each document. A sixth question sits underneath them, and none of the five brings it out: does any of these documents address risk that appears across many agents at once, rather than inside one?
✔Records model monoculture with correlated failure, and multi-agent interaction dynamics, as deployer-side risks.
✔ addresses it · ◐ names it, within one system · ✘ does not